Dangerous Dog Legislation

I recently read an article regarding Dangerous Dog Legislation. I don't like how all dogs of a certain breed(s) can be lumped together in such blanket coverage. ALL dogs are capable of becoming "dangerous", even and sometimes especially the little guys.
I would like to share a voice of reason, why do we not require licensing and training of these dogs? One of my students came up to me after class and wryly commented "This isn't a training class for the dog, it's a puppy parenting class for the parents!"
This is true! When the human knows what to do and how to act with his little furry alien that does not understand a word he's saying better communication and understanding happens. You can then begin to grow a healthy relationship.
However, back to the issue of licensing dogs. It should be more than just licensing. A prospective owner could be required to attend a pet parenting class before adopting the dog. Then require Obedience classes for adopted dogs and parents.
To license a 6 month old puppy, an owner would need to prove they had taken the dog to at least one puppy training course. To license an adult dog, proof of training would be required.
Someone caught with an unlicensed dog would be required to attend a training course to get the dog back.
Raising awareness and proactive training is the way to help solve these problems, not blanket limitations of ownership.
Just my opinion...